This text is an automatic translation from Русский. It was generated by AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Read original →China Responds in Its Own Way. Now the US Pays for Entry
China has responded to US actions by introducing a port fee of 400 yuan per ton. We examine how this new measure will affect logistics, consumer prices, and global supply chains.
AI summary
China has introduced a port fee of 400 yuan per net ton for vessels, which could cost large American ships hundreds of thousands of dollars per port call. This is a retaliatory measure against US actions that will hit the competitiveness of American exporters and could trigger a new wave of global inflation. Beijing is using control over port infrastructure as a tool of economic pressure.
The Economy Takes the Hit
At first glance, 400 yuan per net ton seems trivial compared to the cost of a transoceanic voyage. But do the math, and it's a different story. A large American vessel could pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for a single port call. That money won't go to the U.S. Treasury—it'll flow straight into Chinese port coffers.
At first, companies will try to ignore the new fee. Then they'll start passing costs along: first to carriers, then to shippers, and ultimately to the end consumer. Any new link in the maritime logistics cost chain inevitably shows up on the customer's receipt.
For American exporters, this is especially painful. Their products are already getting more expensive due to a strong dollar and domestic costs. Now logistics to China will become even pricier. Farmers, oil producers, equipment manufacturers—all of them stand to lose some competitive edge.
The irony is that the U.S. wanted to "punish" China with its fees, but may end up punishing itself instead.
Trade Routes Get Rerouted
Measures like these rarely stay confined to a "legal exchange of blows." The market reacts instantly. Carriers start looking for workarounds through third countries, transshipment ports, offshore hubs.
For instance, U.S.-flagged vessels might make heavier use of Singapore, South Korea, or Vietnam as transshipment hubs to "dilute" the route and minimize exposure to the Chinese fee. But that means longer routes, more fuel, higher insurance premiums, more time.
As a result, cargo from California to Shanghai will take longer, cost more, and lose its rationale in an environment where speed and unit costs are the main competitive parameters.
Beijing Is Playing the Long Game
China has a strategic advantage: it controls a huge share of global port infrastructure and container supply. According to 2023 data, China owns or operates ports and terminals at nearly 100 locations in more than 50 countries.